Sam
Shamoun RUNS
Away
From
Genocide,
Terrorism and the Bible
In
the debate Is Islam
a religion of peace? We witnessed Sam Shamoun refused to answer the 3 deadly
questions of Christianity which proved that the Bible approves of genocide and
terrorism as legitimate tactics of war. Shamoun was repeatedly challenged
through out the debate, but he ran away from this issue and falsely claimed it
was off topic. He then confidently made the promise that he would debate the
topic at a later time.
I
have recently contacted him by email to proceed, but now he has refused to
debate. Therefore, when he confidently claimed that he would debate this issue,
it was nothing more than the old “coward’s bluff” to escape from being cornered
on the genocide in the Bible. Unfortunately, the much anticipated debate on the
Bible will not take place.
However
this should come as no big surprise, and this is not the first time. If Sam “The Sham”
Shamoun really thought he could explain away the passages in the Bible which
promotes genocide and terrorism, then he would NEVER have let me get away with
my allegations in the debate, when I stated the following:
”Islam is a religion
of peace, because… it came to confront and condemn the terrorism and genocide
of Biblical Christianity”
If
Shamoun really had a refutation of this argument, he would have taken 2-3
minutes to present it and shut me up.
But he knows very well that the evidence for my statement is CLEAR and
can not be challenged. Therefore he ran like a coward from this issue.
And
finally, keep in mind that Sam Shamoun is a professional liar, therefore he not
going to simply say:
“YEA… lol… when I agreed to debate the Genocide of the Bible
that was a big lie.. and you fell for it!”
As
a professional liar, he is a bit more sophisticated and knows how to employ
smoke screen tactics, which will cloak his deception. However, I was able to
predict before hand his exact tactic and called him out on it when I sent him
the email. Here is what I mean - when I sent the email asking Shamoun to
proceed for this debate on the Bible, I specifically stated the following in my
email:
And
finally, there will be no "if .. then" excuses entertained. Meaning,
do not respond with "IF you do this.. THEN I will fulfill my promise...
Therefore, I am letting you know ahead of time... all "if" conditions
will be rejected”
Why
did I mention this in my email to him? The reason is simple. I knew very well
that Sam Shamoun is a liar and will never debate terrorism and genocide in the
Bible, and will look for some way to out… I predicted that he will introduce a
pre-condition, one which I have already declined in the past. In other words, I
predicted that he will introduce a pre-condition that he knows before hand I
will not accept, therefore when I reject his precondition, he will use that as
an excuse for not debating the terrorism and genocide of the Bible.
And
I was exactly right! Shamoun responded to my email, Ah… but IF you debate me on
Is Muhammed(P) a True Prophet, THEN I will fulfill my promise. I rejected this
proposal in the past because of the ridiculous way in which he wants to debate
this issue. The truth is, this is our favorite topic, and ExamineTheTruth.com
has many debates on this topic.
But Sam “The Sham” Shamoun’s smoke screen
deception back fired on him badly, because this fool did not realize that when
we debate the terrorism and genocide of the Bible, we are also debating the
evidence of Muhammed(P)! Here is how I responded to him:
“As for debating
Muhammed(P), then this only exposes your stupidity, and why you don’t belong in
apologetics – because WE ARE DEBATING "IS MUHAMMED A TRUE PROPHET?".
The fact that Islam clearly condemns terrorism and genocide while Biblical
Christianity fully embraces it... is going to serve as a powerful argument for
Islam… in fact, this is really the debate which will end all debates. We are
going to argue that Muhammed(P) is a true Prophet because of he came to confront
and condemn the terrorism and genocide of this false Jesus christ as taught in
the Bible, and by debating these issues.. we are building the case for
Muhammed(P).
As
I stated in the debate... the Christians need to make a choice…who do they want
to follow... They can not be Christians and condemn terrorism and genocide
because that is a logical contradiction.”
Therefore
his unjustified request was met, yet in spite of this, Shamoun continued to refuse to debate.
Therefore, his claim that he wants to debate ‘Is Muhammed(P) a true Prophet’
was yet another bluff to cover his first bluff which he posed in the debate!
In
conclusion, as I stated in the debate, the Christians will never debate what
the Quran and the Bible has to say about terrorism and genocide because they
know that they will loose the debate. Therefore, they will always play all
kinds of games to avoid this type of comparison from taking place, and the ‘Is
Islam a religion of peace’ debate is just one example.
Go back to ‘Is Islam a Religion of Peace’ debate update
Bogus website Answering-Islam.org DEBUNKED
Lies against Islam
Home