Can someone please explain to me:

 

How can such an IGNORANT man
become the dean of a college?

www.ExamineTheTruth.com

 




Dr. Ergun Caner is simply out of control.  We would like to share with you just a few claims made by Dr. Ergun Caner against Islam. These claims are so absurd and outrageous, that even the most gullible Christian will not be swayed by them. His claims against Islam are completely unfounded and out right bogus. If we are wrong, then we challenge Dr. Caner to produce the evidence for his claims. But don’t take our word for it, have a look for yourself:

 

 

At 17 minutes and 11 seconds of this interview, Dr. Ergun Caner stated:

 

“There is no description in the Quran of Allah, that would ever remotely show him to be the intimate, loving,caring, redeeming God of Jehovah…”



Response:

The Quran states the following:



Say (O Muhammad SAW to mankind): "If you (really) love Allâh then follow me (i.e. accept Islâmic Monotheism, follow the Qur'ân and the Sunnah), Allâh will love you and forgive you of your sins. And Allâh is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful." (Aali Imran 3:31)(*)


Verily, those who believe [in the Oneness of Allâh and in His Messenger (Muhammad SAW)] and work deeds of righteousness, the Most Beneficent (Allâh) will bestow love for them (in the hearts of the believers). (Maryam 19:96)(*)

And He is Oft-Forgiving, full of love (towards the pious who are real true believers of Islâmic Monotheism), (Al-Buruj 85:14) (*)



In addition to that, here are the 99 names of Allah, which Dr. Caner later informs us that “not one of them are intimate” (17:44):

 

 

the Compassionate, the Merciful, the King, the Holy, the Source of Peace, the Preserver of Security, the Protector, the Mighty, the Overpowering, the Great in Majesty, the Creator, the Maker, the Fashioner, the Forgiver, the Dominant, the Bestower, the Provider, the Decider, the Knower, the Withholder, the Plentiful Giver, the Abaser, the Exalter, the Honorer, the Humiliator, the Hearer, the Seer, the Judge, the Just,  the Gracious, the Informed, the Clement, the Incomparably Great, the Forgiving, the Rewarder,  the Most High, the Most Great, the Preserver, the Sustainer, the Reckoner, the Majestic, the Generous, the Watcher, the Answerer, the All Embracing, the Wise, *the Loving*, the Glorious, the Resurrector, the Witness, the Real, the Trustee, the Strong, the Firm, the Patron, the Praiseworthy, the All-Knowing, the Originator, the Restorer to Life, the Giver of Life, the Giver of Death, the Living,  the Eternal, the Self-Sufficient, the Grand, the One, the Single, He to Whom Men Repair, the Powerful, the Prevailing, the Advancer, the Delayer, the First, the Last, the Outward, the Inward, the Governor, the Sublime, the Amply Beneficent, the Acceptor of Repentance, the Avenger, the Pardoner, the Kindly, the Ruler of the Kingdom, the Lord of Majesty and Splendor, the Equitable, the Gatherer, the Independent, the Enricher, the Depriver, the Harmer, the Benefactor, the Light, the Guide, the First Cause, the Enduring, the Inheritor, the Director, the Patient.





At 17 minutes and 53 seconds of the interview, Dr. Ergun Caner stated:


“There is term in surah 50 that says Allah is also as your jugular, which is a threat!  … Yea, he can get to you when he wants to.”

 


Response:

 

This is another false claim. There is nothing within the context of Chapter 50:16 which would ever connotate that this is a threat. This is pure fabrication on the part of Dr. Ergun Caner. In addition to that, when we turn to the early tafsir literature, we find a completely different explanation:



“(And We are nearer to him than his jugular vein.) means, His angels are nearer to man than his jugular vein.”

 

This is yet another example, of how this Dr. Ergun Caner twists and distorts the meaning of the Quran for his own personal pursuit.

 

 

 

At 13:00 min the following comments were made in an interview with For Faith and Family:


“Jill, was there anything in your research of the Quran and hadeeth that surprised you?”

”I guess I really didn’t realize that Muhammed believed that the woman determined the sex of the child, when the women gives birth to a child and it’s a daughter, you know, that’s why a husband can divorce his wife, if she does not produce male children, some Muslim mothers have been welcomed with a slap in the face after giving birth to a daughter instead of a son”

 

Response:

Outrageous lies and deception. This was a comment made by his ignorant wife, but it was done in his presence and with his loving approval. It appears that his wife is just as big of a nut case as him. Nevertheless, none of these assertions are true. Giving birth to a daughter is not grounds for divorce, this is pure fabrication. Rather Islam teaches the exact opposite:

 

 

Book 41, Number 5127:

Narrated Abdullah ibn Abbas:

The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: If anyone has a female child, and does not bury her alive, or slight her, or prefer his children (i.e. the male ones) to her, Allah will bring him into Paradise. Uthman did not mention "male children".


The Quran also states on this matter:

 

And when the news of (the birth of) a female (child) is brought to any of them, his face becomes dark, and he is filled with inward grief! (An-Nahl 16:58)(*)

 

He hides himself from the people because of the evil of that whereof he has been informed. Shall he keep her with dishonour or bury her in the earth[]? Certainly, evil is their decision. (An-Nahl 16:59)(*)

 


As for her comments about slapping a woman in the face, Islam clearly condemns this behavior:


Book 11, Number 2137:

Narrated Mu'awiyah al-Qushayri:

Mu'awiyah asked: Apostle of Allah, what is the right of the wife of one of us over him? He replied: That you should give her food when you eat, clothe her when you clothe yourself, do not strike her on the face, do not revile her or separate yourself from her except in the house. (*)

 

Finally, we leave you with the following racist remark (25:44) he made against Muslims for the entertainment of his white audience:

 

 

“he reaches into Louisville, he reaches into Kentucky, he reaches into America, and he reached me thousands of miles away as a towel head…”



“Offensive”, “revolting” do not adequately describe how I feel about this racist smear and his “Uncle Tom” behavior. I believe I speak for the vast majority of Muslims, in that we won’t simply remain silent about these types of racist remarks. In conclusion, after witnessing such pathological lying, distortion of the facts, and poor scholarship the burning questions which should be on everyone’s mind, is how can such an ignorant man become the dean of a college? What does it have to say for the type of education Liberty University offers? Have you ever heard or read of such a despicable character becoming the dean of any college?

 

 

 



Go back to Unveiling Dr. Ergun Caner’s Canard

Lies Against Islam

Home