Craig Winn Has Been
*BUSTED* LYING
*Update*: Craig Winn EXPOSED by Jalal Abdulrub on
nationally syndicated radio show!
Craig Winn seems
to have written a "secret response" to my direct challenge, which he gave to
some reader… but not me:
http://www.prophetofdoom.net/response_jc1004
Craig Winn
stated:
"Lie to me once, shame on you. Lie to me twice, shame
on me…"
Response:
I challenge
Craig Winn to show me where I lied. This false allegation is nothing but a
projection of himself, as we shall soon see.
Craig Winn
stated:
"when confronted with the rules of debate Nadir ran
back into hiding…"
Response:
Just like
clock work, Craig Winn has been exposed lying. No such thing happened. Go ahead
tough guy, show me where this supposed incident took place. But what did happen
was that Craig Winn started cursing and foaming at the mouth, and I told him
basically that there is no room for this type of behavior in respectable
debates. But, I could have very easily cursed Craig's God, but I refrained,
which made Craig look like a barking dog J .
But, let me
make one thing clear, if this chicken hearted coward ever dare face me in a
public debate, I will *prove* that the Bible is a book of horrible terror, and
terrorism is glorified and is completely applicable for today's time. Never
mind these silly responses which the Christian apologist concoct to cover up
the terroristic verses of the Bible (Sam 1:15), inshallah I will take each
apologetic defense and expose these excuses for the lies and deceit that they
are, and the dumbfounded Craig Winn will not be able to do anything but hurl
more insults. But, I will refrain from referring to his God (Jesus) as a
"terrorist", or "infant slayer" or any insulting remarks.
That's our promise.
But not only
will I prove the Bible is a book of terror, But I will then move forward to
prove that Islam condemns terrorism, and the terrorists of today are clearly in
direct contradiction with the teachings of Prophet Muhammed(P). Folks, what I
will predict for you, is that Craig Winn will not even have a single
intelligent argument to counter my claim. Mark my word, this clown won't even
last a minute with me. That is because, this man, does not know the basics of
Islam. He thinks because he read a couple of books he can now pass himself off
as an "expert". But, Craig Winn is a quack, and he knows that his quackery
will be exposed, and that is why is he is scared to death to come in my
presence. But just as we at ExamineTheTruth.com have pledged before, we will
hunt them down, and we will bring them to justice, inshallah.
Craig Winn
stated:
"Don’t get me wrong, I like to debate. I even prefer
oral debate to written debate in that the former is easier."
Response:
Craig Winn
has been *busted* lying again. In our exchange, Craig Winn stated
the contrary:
"I find that written words are less emotional than
spoken words. That is one of many reasons why I like the online forum. And
neither evidence nor reason is validated or invalidated by emotion. Written
words can be checked, evaluated, contemplated, and analyzed. Tyrants like
Hitler loved the spoken word because of the passion it emoted, causing the
listener to be more easily deceived and manipulated."
"No, your challenge was to debate the question using the agreed sources as evidence. That means we will be using the written word, not the spoken word. That is how the evidence is stored, and that is how it should be presented along with documentation showing the location of the passage in an English translation. If you want to hold a web cast after we have held an online debate using the written word, that’s fine with me but it will be far less scholastic and valuable."
So, which one
is it Craig?
Craig Winn
stated:
"If Nadir really wants to debate my conclusions about
Muhammad, the Qur’an, Allah and Islam derived from the Islamic scriptures and
presented in Prophet of Doom, he can. The entire book is free online. He can
start with the Prologue and work through the Source Material Appendix. If he
can refute Prophet of Doom’s evidence and reason using equally authentic
sources without contradicting his prophet and god, I’ll do better than
respond—I’ll give him what he craves most: attention and praise. (Craig)"
Response:
Radio? Craig
Winn has put another hurdle in our way. This foul man is trying to do what ever
he can for this debate NOT to take place. I have never heard of any Christian,
Muslim, Atheist ...etc debater ever make this stipulation. Nevertheless, if any
radio show would like to broadcast it live, I’m up for it. But the venue I
would propose are college campuses (Muslim Student Association), or
Paltalk.com. I can have it set up in a matter of hours.
Craig Winn
stated:
"But to
waste hours in a PalTalk chatroom with Nadir and a hundred Muslims isn’t a
productive use of my time"
Response:
This shows
Craig Winn's stupidity. These debates which have taken place on paltalk.com can
be downloaded from my website and have been heard by tens of thousands of people
all over the world. These debates are also being used for dawa purposes in
converting Christians to Islam, and settling discussions between Muslims and
Christians all over the world. The debate can also take place concurrently on
both paltalk and the radio.
Paltalk.com
is really the way to go, I perfer it over campus debates, because, in campus
debates, only local people attend, but paltalk debates, people from all over
the world can attend the debate. ExamineTheTruth.com has readers from all over
the world like UK, Canada, Australia, Bahrain China.. etc.
Thus far,
Craig Winn has been hiding in his spider hole like Saddam Hussein, from where
he wants to write letters back and forth, Craig Winn, you are embarrassing your
own flock, courageously come forward and accept this challenge for debate
entitled:
"Does Christianity or Islam promote
Terrorism?"
And lets GET
IT ON.