Craig Winn Has Been *BUSTED* LYING
Craig Winn seems to have written a "secret response" to my direct challenge, which he gave to some readerÖ but not me:
Craig Winn stated:
"Lie to me once, shame on you. Lie to me twice, shame on meÖ"
I challenge Craig Winn to show me where I lied. This false allegation is nothing but a projection of himself, as we shall soon see.
Craig Winn stated:
"when confronted with the rules of debate Nadir ran back into hidingÖ"
Just like clock work, Craig Winn has been exposed lying. No such thing happened. Go ahead tough guy, show me where this supposed incident took place. But what did happen was that Craig Winn started cursing and foaming at the mouth, and I told him basically that there is no room for this type of behavior in respectable debates. But, I could have very easily cursed Craig's God, but I refrained, which made Craig look like a barking dog J .
But, let me make one thing clear, if this chicken hearted coward ever dare face me in a public debate, I will *prove* that the Bible is a book of horrible terror, and terrorism is glorified and is completely applicable for today's time. Never mind these silly responses which the Christian apologist concoct to cover up the terroristic verses of the Bible (Sam 1:15), inshallah I will take each apologetic defense and expose these excuses for the lies and deceit that they are, and the dumbfounded Craig Winn will not be able to do anything but hurl more insults. But, I will refrain from referring to his God (Jesus) as a "terrorist", or "infant slayer" or any insulting remarks. That's our promise.
But not only will I prove the Bible is a book of terror, But I will then move forward to prove that Islam condemns terrorism, and the terrorists of today are clearly in direct contradiction with the teachings of Prophet Muhammed(P). Folks, what I will predict for you, is that Craig Winn will not even have a single intelligent argument to counter my claim. Mark my word, this clown won't even last a minute with me. That is because, this man, does not know the basics of Islam. He thinks because he read a couple of books he can now pass himself off as an "expert". But, Craig Winn is a quack, and he knows that his quackery will be exposed, and that is why is he is scared to death to come in my presence. But just as we at ExamineTheTruth.com have pledged before, we will hunt them down, and we will bring them to justice, inshallah.
Craig Winn stated:
"Donít get me wrong, I like to debate. I even prefer oral debate to written debate in that the former is easier."
Craig Winn has been *busted* lying again. In our exchange, Craig Winn stated the contrary:
"I find that written words are less emotional than spoken words. That is one of many reasons why I like the online forum. And neither evidence nor reason is validated or invalidated by emotion. Written words can be checked, evaluated, contemplated, and analyzed. Tyrants like Hitler loved the spoken word because of the passion it emoted, causing the listener to be more easily deceived and manipulated."
"No, your challenge was to debate the question using the agreed sources as evidence. That means we will be using the written word, not the spoken word. That is how the evidence is stored, and that is how it should be presented along with documentation showing the location of the passage in an English translation. If you want to hold a web cast after we have held an online debate using the written word, thatís fine with me but it will be far less scholastic and valuable."
So, which one is it Craig?
Craig Winn stated:
"If Nadir really wants to debate my conclusions about Muhammad, the Qurían, Allah and Islam derived from the Islamic scriptures and presented in Prophet of Doom, he can. The entire book is free online. He can start with the Prologue and work through the Source Material Appendix. If he can refute Prophet of Doomís evidence and reason using equally authentic sources without contradicting his prophet and god, Iíll do better than respondóIíll give him what he craves most: attention and praise. (Craig)"
Radio? Craig Winn has put another hurdle in our way. This foul man is trying to do what ever he can for this debate NOT to take place. I have never heard of any Christian, Muslim, Atheist ...etc debater ever make this stipulation. Nevertheless, if any radio show would like to broadcast it live, Iím up for it. But the venue I would propose are college campuses (Muslim Student Association), or Paltalk.com. I can have it set up in a matter of hours.
"But to waste hours in a PalTalk chatroom with Nadir and a hundred Muslims isnít a productive use of my time"
This shows Craig Winn's stupidity. These debates which have taken place on paltalk.com can be downloaded from my website and have been heard by tens of thousands of people all over the world. These debates are also being used for dawa purposes in converting Christians to Islam, and settling discussions between Muslims and Christians all over the world. The debate can also take place concurrently on both paltalk and the radio.
Paltalk.com is really the way to go, I perfer it over campus debates, because, in campus debates, only local people attend, but paltalk debates, people from all over the world can attend the debate. ExamineTheTruth.com has readers from all over the world like UK, Canada, Australia, Bahrain China.. etc.
Thus far, Craig Winn has been hiding in his spider hole like Saddam Hussein, from where he wants to write letters back and forth, Craig Winn, you are embarrassing your own flock, courageously come forward and accept this challenge for debate entitled:
"Does Christianity or Islam promote Terrorism?"
And lets GET IT ON.